After learning that Zheng Shuang was a person and that this incident originated from drawing with her baby, she chatted with Bao Ma, who went to class, about "Zheng Shuang's surrogacy and abandonment"
I was confused
At first, I felt disconnected from the society and didn't know anything; Then ponder, who is Zheng Shuang? What does it have to do with me? Immediately relieved
However, within two days of this relief, the editor in chief made a speech to let everyone express their views on this news
It would be better to have a solution
Alas, it seems that the Zheng Shuang incident is something I can't get around
Gossip is not a table, enter the topic
Although I know little about the Zheng Shuang incident, and I have no impression of the person, but I look at the essence through the phenomenon and remove the numerous and complicated clues
We find the essence of the incident: surrogacy
Adding the attribute to it is "the star finds a surrogate", and adding some extension to it is "the star finds a surrogate and then abandons it"
In this way, it really has nothing to do with Zheng Shuang, and "Zheng Shuang" is just a specific category of "stars"
So let's look at the essence - surrogacy
It can be analyzed from three aspects: medical perspective, ethical principles and laws and regulations
From the medical point of view, "surrogacy" probably comes from the following two aspects: 1
The mother itself has defects and does not have the congenital conditions for pregnancy; If there is no uterus or abnormal uterus; 2
The mother suffers from the medical taboo symptoms of pregnancy
If she is not suitable for pregnancy, her life will be endangered
It is deduced that "surrogacy" is one of the ways that people who want to become parents have to do from a medical point of view
Because there is at least one way to be a parent: adoption
So what is the difference between "surrogacy" and "adoption"? On the surface, the difference seems to lie in blood relationship
Surrogacy seems to have a certain blood relationship with the mother who wants to become a mother, while adoption can basically exclude any blood relationship with parents (of course, the adoption of children between relatives is not included)
So let's see if "surrogacy" is classified from a medical point of view
1
Traditional surrogacy refers to putting the male sperm into the female body by artificial insemination and combining it with the surrogate's egg
The child born in this situation has a genetic relationship with the surrogate
In essence, it is "borrowing the palace +"
Note: this surrogate has no blood relationship with the mother who wants to be a mother
2
Pregnancy surrogacy is a process in which the sperm and eggs of both husband and wife form a fertilized egg, and then the fertilized egg is implanted into the surrogate's uterus
Of course, this kind of surrogacy came into being only after the medical community had the technology of test tube baby
Pregnancy surrogacy, in essence, is equivalent to "renting" the surrogate's uterus, and the surrogate has no genetic relationship with the child, that is, borrowing the uterus + No
At this time, the surrogate is the mother of the child in the legal sense, and the mother who raises the child is the biological mother of the child (it's really windy, the head is big)
Based on the above analysis, it can be seen that the first kind of surrogacy is not very different from adoption for mothers who want to be mothers but have no fertility
The bigger difference is that it is genetically related to their fathers
Therefore, only from the medical point of view, pregnancy surrogacy is the only choice for mothers who want to have their own children but have no fertility
Since it is the only one, why not choose surrogate? Why has the public remarked on the word "surrogate"? Comment and comment? Let's look at the impact of surrogacy from an ethical point of view
Let's talk about traditional surrogacy
The child is genetically related to the surrogate and the legal father who requires surrogacy, but has no genetic relationship with the legal mother who requires surrogacy
In this sense, the legal mother is more like a "stepmother"
Not to mention the stepmother's own mental confusion, we can imagine that it would be uncomfortable to put it on anyone
After all, my man and a woman I don't know gave birth to their own child, but I am responsible for raising the child
"Raising" is the word, but my mother should be responsible for it for at least ten years
During this period, it is inevitable that there will be bad times for children, and there will inevitably be moments of emotional irritability
Then insiders, even dads, are likely to say that you are not your own mother, so you will treat your children like this
Just thinking about it so casually, you feel that this is a very uneconomical and thankless thing! In case you meet another unreasonable surrogate, you either want to see your own child from time to time - although this is human nature, or you have a crush on the surrogate's family and want to replace it, OhMyGod! From the point of view of the legal mother, it is simply unimaginable! The original intention is to have a child, but it is possible to have an existing marriage and life for this! From the perspective of the surrogate, whether traditional or pregnancy surrogacy, after all, she was pregnant in October
Once she gave birth, she had formed a kind of family dispute with her child, but she was told to separate from her child and become someone else's child
This "falling flesh" inevitably did not hurt her and inevitably did not make her have a whim
How to overcome this emotional barrier? Apart from the medical point of view of infertility, what is more controversial is "commercial surrogacy"
Just like the Zheng Shuang incident, I believe that a large part of the public's controversy lies in "commerce", and the reason why CCTV blocked Zheng Shuang should also be mainly in "commerce"
Let's take a look at the psychological activities, or ideological activities, of the public
"You're great if you have money? You don't have to have children by yourself?" "As a star, do you know what it means to set an example? For the sake of body and beauty, you don't even need to be a woman!" Forget it
It doesn't matter how the public will condemn Zheng Shuang anymore
What matters is whether this surrogate can be commercialized
Let's imagine that if it can be commercialized, the womb of women, including the child, will be commercialized
That is to say, people can be exchanged or bought and sold as commodities, and people will eventually be materialized
Can we deduce that buying and selling children is also reasonable and legal? Further derivation, is human trafficking also reasonable and legal? Oh, this has come to the point of whether surrogacy conforms to the laws and regulations
Assuming that surrogacy can be allowed, relevant laws and regulations must be issued to ensure that the interests of both surrogacy parties can be fair and reasonable
But you see, if surrogacy is established, China's existing law on the protection of the rights and interests of women and children is obviously no longer applicable, and some provisions still contradict surrogacy
Not to mention whether the "spear" or the "shield" is important, we can only choose one, that is, we must revise it to adapt to the "legal surrogacy"
However, the reality is that China does not recognize surrogacy, and it is impossible to legalize it for the time being
And I won't immediately start relevant legal provisions because of Zheng Shuang
Some people say that surrogacy is indeed allowed in some relatively "developed" countries, and relevant laws and regulations have also been formulated
Yes, the United States boasts freedom, but only some states legislate to recognize surrogacy
This has also led to the birth of related industries
For example, when seeking surrogacy, relevant lawyers and insurance institutions are required to participate in the signing of contracts, which requires lawyers with professional knowledge of third-party fertility
In addition, Russia, Greece, Ukraine and gruyaji are currently fully legal domestic commercial surrogacy in Europe, and these domestic laws clearly stipulate that surrogacy is legal
Of course, there will be some differences
Oh, it seems to be a bit off the topic
Let's put it this way
Existence is reasonable, but rationality does not mean legality
Since surrogacy is reasonably legalized in these countries, can we suggest Zheng Shuang to immigrate to these countries and then legalize surrogacy? I think this is a more appropriate solution that I can come up with, and there is no prejudice or irrationality, and it will not involve any privacy of Zheng Shuang, nor will it make any comments on her and related people
So far, the event has ended
After checking, it is said on the Internet that India has become a "baby factory" producing life because of commercial surrogacy
In India, the purpose of commercial surrogacy is only to improve the living conditions of the surrogate through surrogacy
However, the actual situation is that the surrogate mothers did not get the due remuneration, and instead let the surrogate intermediary earn dividends
Let's illustrate with data
For couples who need surrogacy, the cost of surrogacy for a child is about $22400, and each surrogate mother receives only about $8000
Therefore, although many people really need surrogacy in reality, in order not to make surrogacy a tool for profit, and in order not to have one baby factory after another in the world, let us work together to avoid touching this ethical red line
